- Search Forex Factory
- 2,913 Results (1 Thread , 2,912 Replies )
- Capablanca replied 9 hr ago
Online props are casino games. They need gamblers (it's not like real props). They can't survive without gamblers. They need to balance the aggressiveness in rules. Don't want to scare gamblers but can't allow gamblers to hit them hard.
- Capablanca replied 9 hr ago
I have already said that 4 or 5 times in this thread. I used Top Step in the past and orders were NOT going to real market. I made the trail audit myself at the time.
- Capablanca replied 9 hr ago
I just skimmed the last pages of that thread and I must say that "claims" of people not agreeing with rules, finding them too complex, not understanding rules, thinking that the promos of 1 day are a scam, etc. it's not the same than claims of ...
- Capablanca replied 34 hr ago
When you pay the fee for PA the correspondent Eval disappears if you do a refresh. It's canceled automatically by their system.
- Capablanca replied 36 hr ago
It's no surprise. It would be an hidden form of hedging. Not a direct 1:1, like long/short ES, but a very good proxy for casino machines that only charge 10%. If we pull out a series of daily ES and NQ database we can trade the ratio between them. ...
- Capablanca replied May 17, 2024
If I ever get to a payout in Apex I fear that won't be any money left. Monty already cleaned everything.
- Capablanca replied May 17, 2024
I think the "logic" of this is: 1. In MFFU You can ask (and pay) for a reset, which is cheaper than a new account (in Apex this would not be worth because new accounts are cheaper than reset). Therefore, you need to have the account active 2. At the ...
- Capablanca replied May 17, 2024
This is nothing crazy. I was thinking in something like 20 or 30 lots on a 100K acct. If CTI doesn't want that they should either limit leverage or lot sizing clearly. I hate this kind of shady behavior of prop firms and their hidden rules.
- Capablanca replied May 17, 2024
You missed it because they don't disclose that upfront, which IMO is unethical. Anyway, you just make a bold boring video which they won't ever use anywhere or, alternatively, you just focus on points that are not good. There's no obligation to say ...
- Capablanca replied May 17, 2024
As far as I remember the trades were automatically closed if we missed the SL 60 seconds and it was not a hard breach. Not sure if it's like this now. What I didn't like in them is that to receive funded credentials we need to send a video of of ...
- Capablanca replied May 17, 2024
I saw that in Discord yesterday. It's a complete mess. Tradovate seems to be unable to cope with all the new account requests. I can't imagine the pile of money that is now flowing to futures. No wonder that forex antics are feeling the pain.
- Capablanca replied May 17, 2024
And they say we need to treat the accounts as if it was our real account. Who would intentionally try to lose money on his own account or stop making money on a day ? No wonder people have to game the system.
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
It's true. There's an abnormal number of claims about Wise in offshore talks forum, mainly regarding freezing accounts during months and asking for proof of funds and / or closing the account without explanation, asking people to move funds from ...
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
There was a guy in twitter claiming against RealFundsTrader not paying because of some hidden news rule and I'm 99% sure that it was also taurex.
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
Strange. I though they were an ACG whitelabel
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
Not new but in a nutshell in funded: 30% consistency 20% max flipping days SLs in orders Max 1:3 risk (risking 3 to profit 1) No DCA (apparently adding 1 position in loss is still fine) Consistency in sizing during trading days. No windfall days. No ...
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
FTMO to launch a broker. url Takisd any opinion on this ?
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
For what I read in Discord they seem to have problems today with Tradovate. I guess Tradovate is not copping with so much madness in futures right now.
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
That's what I call gaming the rules. But, yep, you're right. I also thought about that (in fact, for each rule they produce we have different ways of gaming them).
- Capablanca replied May 16, 2024
The problem with this kind of rules is that we're always afraid that they use them to ban us for small details or even errors. For example 1:3 max risk. What if I don't set SLs ? How do they know what was my R/R ? By the previous days ? OK, but ...