- Search Forex Factory
- Orest replied Feb 13, 2010
Don, is it on weekly time frame (rather starting every week) and resetting itself on the start of the next week? Yes, would be interesting to see the results. Take a rest.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 13, 2010
Here is how to achieve 99% of modeling quality for backtesting if somebody's interested. Painful, but possible url Hey, Don when you have a chance.... on what indicators and what rules your future EA would be based on? Did you mean just classic ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 13, 2010
It definitely should work Empori, schmerex had similar problem, but he's figured in the end how to do that. Use your mouse like 4-5 times to select the label. The EA just might be busy at that time, over several clicks you should be able to select ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 13, 2010
Don, Fibonacci lines are widely used as unofficial (well, it's kind of official if it's widely used, isn't it?) support and resistance lines. The are normally drawn from most recent Highest High to most recent Lowest Low. In MT4 platform you could ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 12, 2010
This week results — A brief wrap up about this passed trading week results. 1. It was clearly bullish week for currency basket method. If somebody went long in the beginning of the week he/she would ended up with sightly more then 1000 pips ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 11, 2010
Okay, updated version is attached, same release number. 1. Right - the problem was - I calculated open/close date/time in precision of 1 min, so if the time was quite a bit far in the history I looked many thousands bars back. If you have Bars on ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 11, 2010
Hi Dan, this is another methodology I was interested in. Instead of taking off by all 14 pairs trade those ran-away once. Very often when basket goes down there are some pairs in the positive territory. If we could recognize conditions when it's ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 11, 2010
Hi Emprori, I think your scenario is perfectly possible in a way as it is now. All you have to do is to use different MAGICs. Here is what I would do. 1. Leave the standard magic. Open whatever basket (buy/sell) you want. 2. Go to properties and ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 10, 2010
Don, regarding automatic Fibo it's perfectly possible to mimic ZZ from your code of BuyAllPairs. We just need to calculate Highest High and Lowest Low for the period using your combined pips data. I don't see an urgent necessity though since on H1 ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 10, 2010
Schmurex, what I meant was: here are your pairs - EURJPY, GBPJPY , AUDJPY , EURCHF, NZDUSD. As you can see there are 3 JPY pairs and 2 EUR pairs, other than that all other pairs are unique. The group is heavy "into JPY" anyway, so strong move of JPY ...
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 10, 2010
Backtesting — Folks, would be great if somebody takes some time and uses that basket backtesting tool Don provided a few pages back and share the results of course.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple methodI'm running out of time.
- Orest replied Feb 9, 2010
Shmurex, I think EURJPY should go from your list too, this way you maintain some kind of balance.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 9, 2010
Okay, sold the basket now. 4h column (and all lower once) shows pretty much very strong trend down. Maybe needed to wait more, let's see.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 9, 2010
I'm watching T101_BuyAllPais.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 9, 2010
I wish I could be awake for London (lame excuse I know). I could be on some days of course, but not every day.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 9, 2010
By the way I think we should watch out for the massive sell off now, don't you think so? According to BuyAllPairs , it's 02.10 1:00 GMT here in Denver.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 9, 2010
v1.18 — New version. Closer to excel spreadsheet.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple methodThanks Don and shmurex for your insights regarding static columns. I'm still not sure if Profit_Protection part needs to be improved. I kinda like what HistoryFx doing, but he uses pips and ...
- Orest replied Feb 9, 2010
Welcome, hazel - that's what we are hoping for too.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple methodDon seems knows what he is doing and not greedy to share his knowledge. Also, note - here we don't tell you what to use or what not to . "Julius asked me to remove the indicator" - funniest thing ...
- Orest replied Feb 8, 2010
I think I would just replace those existing labels for opening trades when all signals are ligned up with open NOW once. What do you think? Or make additional once?
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method
- Orest replied Feb 8, 2010
This is makes a perfect sense, History. Currently Profit Protection only moves a SL when you are in profit. I need to bookmark this.
Indicators development for T101's not very simple method