- Search Forex Factory
- chester123 replied Mar 16, 2017
Now it seems market has taken the hike as a dovish hike = C scenario. image I think the FED flow should send us to top (minimum) triggering for the 3rd time choose your poison ST. But in any case. Im kind of loosing faith in the ST leg down/mid ...
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 15, 2017
Hi guys, so here is my try for FED: FA scenarions from most to least probable (according to me): Market expects hike and some sort of upbeat macro projections and soft steepening of hike projections. A.: hike + above market extectations (hawkish) ...
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 13, 2017
Thanks sisse for the kind words. This approach really showed me much much more which I have never seen in the price before. Will try to go deeper and post again when time allows. And will try to keep your advice as once you discover some TA-tool it ...
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 12, 2017
very interesting comments janpec. basically I completely agree that its important to move closer to the structures becuase just plotting a chart with swing lows and highs is un-trdable of course plus there is the whole timing, FA, risk managment ...
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 12, 2017
Just in case anyone is actually thinking about the price analysis and the charts I posted - I think there is one mistake - the support/resistance zone does not extent into the top/low of the extension but remains the same as you can see here.
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 12, 2017
Hi guys, so just a follow up of the Friday price analysis discussion. If anyone wants to fully understand I think its essential to go back to one of the previous series of price analysis sisse shared before. If you need it find his 11,116 post. It ...
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
so its E and close is? I would say neutral. cuz its inside the range which is newly the high of last wick and low of last E to the downside. Gotta say that I went through many of your very old posts with charts but now I see it in absolutely ...
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
yes, It depends on how FA relates to this. FA does not guarantee the break. just lets look at recent ST 1,050-1,053 in EU - it made some extension in FA ST sell but did not happen.
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
so 6th is break and last is ext. Sorry, I was modifing the post - have some questions on timing but need more time to formulate
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
break on the first new candle (9th). than a new range and 19th candle is break up which failed and after its just range extended on second candle from end.
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
we did not extend the range. last picture: no? it extended the range but remained inside the range.
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
well, its tricky one. I know where this aims. cuz its in the wick. so no?
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
no, its just a range witha failed attempt of bears to break down.
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
well, Im even afraid to answer
The Really Useless Threadbut as I understand it "yes".
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
yes, I do not expect it there either. I was just answering the question what would be a clear technical signal for me that the MT move down is finished.
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
well, the high is range of 079-082. no? Q4: to the downside. Q5: ST = sell, MT= strong sell. But if there is acu-dis happening on ST (staying in ST range) as seen as a temporar stop on MT, should not we have ST neutral? Maybe we have wrong ...
The Really Useless Thread
- chester123 replied Mar 10, 2017
Im not sure but I would say if next M1 close is above or on 1.081 area.
The Really Useless Thread