Hello algoTraderJo, glad to see you back ![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/1f44d.png?v=15.1)
I am also following with great interest!
As I subscribed to the Asirikuy framework I wondered sometimes if algoTraderJo was Daniel himself since, if I am not mistaken, you left us with similar questions and ML achievements/results as realised in the community![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/1f615.png?v=15.1)
![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/2753.png?v=15.1)
There is a lot of valuable info in your thread as is in Daniels and the community forum - great! But the community seems to put more effort on the price action systems. I enjoy more the approach with ML and try to learn from you and reproduce your results.
Thank you for sharing!
When it comes to choosing ensambles I am still stuck with lots of bias (and drawdown
)- same as with any trading system, choosing ensambles on the IS often does not result in good OOS.
Cheers
KaBo
![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/1f44d.png?v=15.1)
I am also following with great interest!
As I subscribed to the Asirikuy framework I wondered sometimes if algoTraderJo was Daniel himself since, if I am not mistaken, you left us with similar questions and ML achievements/results as realised in the community
![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/1f615.png?v=15.1)
![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/2753.png?v=15.1)
There is a lot of valuable info in your thread as is in Daniels and the community forum - great! But the community seems to put more effort on the price action systems. I enjoy more the approach with ML and try to learn from you and reproduce your results.
Thank you for sharing!
When it comes to choosing ensambles I am still stuck with lots of bias (and drawdown
![](https://resources.faireconomy.media/images/emojis/64/1f641.png?v=15.1)
Cheers
KaBo