Hi ffers,
I am NoobShow (I'm sure you know nothing about me) , i am a cool Programmer (My Source Of Living) , i do trade manually because of my Unbelievable Strategy (Multiple Calculation) and for my lack of trust for Robots.
Until Now, i never believe Robots (Including my previous profitable ones), but sitting down with my PC within 2 weeks of writing and scratching of head, i now have a Complex-written ready-made robot backtested with the little data i have on my PC (1971 - 1994 , 24.97% Modelling quality on M1).
I will be uploading the Screenshot now....
What i really need is someone with 99.99% modelling quality tick data (High Rank Members Only) to backtest this for me, it open trades based on ticks (Close[] of Some bars).
I made some backtest from 2014 to last week and Its profit was $9,000,000+ with a Capital of $10000 and 2% Risk.
Also from 1997-1994, 1% Risk, Capital of $500 turns $14,000,000+
Low Drawdown on the two trades...
I am NoobShow (I'm sure you know nothing about me) , i am a cool Programmer (My Source Of Living) , i do trade manually because of my Unbelievable Strategy (Multiple Calculation) and for my lack of trust for Robots.
Until Now, i never believe Robots (Including my previous profitable ones), but sitting down with my PC within 2 weeks of writing and scratching of head, i now have a Complex-written ready-made robot backtested with the little data i have on my PC (1971 - 1994 , 24.97% Modelling quality on M1).
I will be uploading the Screenshot now....
What i really need is someone with 99.99% modelling quality tick data (High Rank Members Only) to backtest this for me, it open trades based on ticks (Close[] of Some bars).
I made some backtest from 2014 to last week and Its profit was $9,000,000+ with a Capital of $10000 and 2% Risk.
Also from 1997-1994, 1% Risk, Capital of $500 turns $14,000,000+
Low Drawdown on the two trades...