DislikedYou have a system that every 100 trades , it wins 70 and loses 30. So you boldly assume that moving SL to BE will make you lose only 25 and win 70 ?? Why not lose 30 and win 65 ?? How do you know that when price returns to its entry point there is more chance it will hit SL than it will hit TP ??Ignored
From my research, each pair tends to exhibit an "amount of no return" for each time frame where if price goes too far, it rarely (5% or less) comes back. That human sentiment has a certain elasticity to it per time frame, beyond which price doesn't retrace.
DislikedIf you entered at S/R area or a break of S/R , there is more chance that price will bounce in you favor again , not the opposite.Ignored
DislikedA system with high percentage of winning , when price returns to the entry , why do you assume it has more chance to hit SL than TP ??!!Ignored
Your argument wasn't that "SL to BE sucks" but rather a very specific subset of that, that SL to BE equates to a new open trade. You aren't supporting that conclusion here.